Advertisement
I've been thinking about this a lot, even more lately since I've returned from the playa. Things are all still very fuzzy, but I thought I would bring it up for discussion to help bring things more into focus for me. I figured this was the best place to do it.
Back in the 60's there was a movement for liberation of women. Sexuality became ours, in theory. We were no longer restricted by husbands or fathers in the choices we made. The world became wide open. The liberated, free woman was able to choose her own partners and with birth control, was able to even enjoy sex without the concern of a long-term commitment. Now this situation has come to define woman and her freedom. Sexual expression.
My question is: does freedom have to come in terms of sexuality? Does a woman who is "sexy", or (heaven forbid!) "good in bed" deprive the world of some sort of value by not engaging? Why is it that sexuality seems to overshadow the other positive attributes a woman may have?
Only recently have I stopped wearing shapeless and frumpy clothing. I haven't lost the weight I put on during an extended disability because I don't want to be seen as that kind of woman. I do like looking pretty and wearing pretty things, but I am very uncomfortable with marking myself in terms of my sexuality. (I work in an extremely male-dominated field and sexual tension on the job only makes what I do more difficult.)
I found issues to be even more pronounced on the playa. Yes, both men and women were often wearing sexy or skimpy costumes (or nothing at all), but there was a clear gender bias in roles people played. As an educated, technical person, I'm accustomed to being taken seriously, and found it disconcerting. When in costumes that were not particularly sexy, regardless of their quality, I became largely invisible. I dressed up in my spandex-slip-and-dangly-coat outfit and got dragged around places. Take a look at the photographs of people who were out there. Fat men are OK, but no, not fat women!
I'm still working out exactly what is going on that bothers me so much. Some specific things that people have said have taken me aback, such as:
- Discussing myself appearing to someone as "sexy". As if this is an important thing to aspire to. I aspire to be respected, which isn't the same thing at all. (In fact, I can give lots of specific instances where it's quite the opposite.)
- Hearing someone explain that a woman who was not frequently sexually active was repressed and that it was some great tragedy if she were good in bed and not opening herself up for more sex. As if she owed it to the world.
These are things I was hearing from friends - people I liked, so it's not that it's a big controversy or anything, just a slight perspective issue that l find difficult.
Respect, of course, doesn't seem to be paired with sexuality at all, in fact from what I've seen there's an inverse relationship. Although the invisibility becomes a question. How do women gain it in the community? It's clearly different than for men. Why? How? What role does sex play in respect? Positive? Negative?
Back in the 60's there was a movement for liberation of women. Sexuality became ours, in theory. We were no longer restricted by husbands or fathers in the choices we made. The world became wide open. The liberated, free woman was able to choose her own partners and with birth control, was able to even enjoy sex without the concern of a long-term commitment. Now this situation has come to define woman and her freedom. Sexual expression.
My question is: does freedom have to come in terms of sexuality? Does a woman who is "sexy", or (heaven forbid!) "good in bed" deprive the world of some sort of value by not engaging? Why is it that sexuality seems to overshadow the other positive attributes a woman may have?
Only recently have I stopped wearing shapeless and frumpy clothing. I haven't lost the weight I put on during an extended disability because I don't want to be seen as that kind of woman. I do like looking pretty and wearing pretty things, but I am very uncomfortable with marking myself in terms of my sexuality. (I work in an extremely male-dominated field and sexual tension on the job only makes what I do more difficult.)
I found issues to be even more pronounced on the playa. Yes, both men and women were often wearing sexy or skimpy costumes (or nothing at all), but there was a clear gender bias in roles people played. As an educated, technical person, I'm accustomed to being taken seriously, and found it disconcerting. When in costumes that were not particularly sexy, regardless of their quality, I became largely invisible. I dressed up in my spandex-slip-and-dangly-coat outfit and got dragged around places. Take a look at the photographs of people who were out there. Fat men are OK, but no, not fat women!
I'm still working out exactly what is going on that bothers me so much. Some specific things that people have said have taken me aback, such as:
- Discussing myself appearing to someone as "sexy". As if this is an important thing to aspire to. I aspire to be respected, which isn't the same thing at all. (In fact, I can give lots of specific instances where it's quite the opposite.)
- Hearing someone explain that a woman who was not frequently sexually active was repressed and that it was some great tragedy if she were good in bed and not opening herself up for more sex. As if she owed it to the world.
These are things I was hearing from friends - people I liked, so it's not that it's a big controversy or anything, just a slight perspective issue that l find difficult.
Respect, of course, doesn't seem to be paired with sexuality at all, in fact from what I've seen there's an inverse relationship. Although the invisibility becomes a question. How do women gain it in the community? It's clearly different than for men. Why? How? What role does sex play in respect? Positive? Negative?
Advertisement
Advertisement
-
Re: A different kind of freedom.
Tue, September 18, 2007 - 4:31 PMhmmmm. first, i don't really agree with your basic premise, that the women's movement is defined by sexual freedom. sexual choices, yes but it is not, and never has been, what feminism is about to me, and has also never been the standard by which i measure my freedom.
in fact, i am pretty private about my sexuality, and i think that very few people who know me, or know of me, filter me through a sexual thought process. my freedom is clear from what i say and how i live my life, but not because of my sexual choices or expression. in other words, i am respected because of who i am, and for most people, my sexual self is not even a part of that picture.
sure, i encounter people who think it's better to be very active sexually or whatever opinion they might have. the narrower their opinion, the less likely i am to give it much credence.
and i really take exception to your assertion that fat women are not considered ok on the playa. what are you talking about? first, from a quick check at your photos, you're not fat. so really what is up with that? it feels like you're taking on some kind of fat persona when that's not even who you are. and then you're using it as some kind of evidence that people aren't being fair to you.
i am fat. and i'm also totally hot to people who like women like me. just like some skinny women are hot to people who like women like them. and brainiac women are hot to people who like women like them. and i rarely encounter anyone who discounts me as a person because of my size... they may write me off as a lover, maybe, but that's ok, they're not for me, then.
i guess what i am saying is that if you are looking for bias against you for your gender, or your sexual choices, or your body, then you will find it. and if you look for validation for who you are, including your gender, your body and your sexual choices, you'll find that too.
i choose to look for the positive reinforcements, and the more i look, the more i find them, and the more confident i become. and if i encounter people here or on the playa who might discount me for some superficial reason, i may talk to them so they see more of who i really am, or i might just move on to someone who's more my style. the world's a big place.
i don't know you, so this might not apply, but as far as being invisible, i think that it is often a habit that takes some real work to break, since it's about shifting your own self-image.
i have a number of friends who worked hard to be invisible in their lives, usually since childhood. they felt safer if they cultivated an ordinary appearance. they shrink from opportunities to step forward and assert their opinions. they often take on a "it's not my fault" stance, but really, when they realize how they've been feeding the perception that they are invisible, by how they dress, how they speak, what they say, and who they are in the world. when they get tired of that, and are willing to take on a new external not-invisible persona, then something shifts and they are willing to live bigger and bolder and to be more outspoken.
and clothing does make us feel differently about ourselves. that's one of the reasons i like to work with people to figure out what kind of clothing and personal appearance fits their personality and who they are in the world.
certainly, how we dress and appear affects what people will think of us. is that superficial? perhaps, in the same way that art is superficial. it's external, certainly, and not necessary for survival, but it creates a reaction in people, and makes a huge difference in our self-expression, and it *definitely* makes a difference in how people interact with us.
i wonder if your experience of people treating you differently when you were plainly dressed than when you were dressed in a slip and coat is as easily explained by the fact that you felt differently, and behaved differently, when wearing those different outfits? were you putting out different energy, and therefore being perceived differently? -
-
Re: A different kind of freedom.
Tue, September 18, 2007 - 4:45 PMNo, I'm not excessively fat, nor would I want to be. I'm not skinny either. I try not to be anything at all.
You also seem to be missing my point. I'm not looking to be a martyr (like so many on this board seem to be). I'm working through issues I have with respect, respectability and something that's not quite coercion, but more an encouragement to interact with people in ways that involve sexuality. -
-
Re: A different kind of freedom.
Tue, September 18, 2007 - 5:21 PMDo you mean that the playa encourages open sexuality in women differently than it does for men?
I think I see some of what you mean and agree that there can be differences in approach, but do believe that women can be "sexy" and respected at the same time.
Most of the women I respect are sexy, be it because they physically, mentally or emotionally integrate their sexuality so it's not simply a tool. Lots of times, it's attitude. Rarely does size enter into it. It's an "it" - there or not. Fostered or not. Don't even think it has to do with having sex itself. It's definetly not there when wanting to be invisible for myself lol.
It doesn't surprise me about say the photos of fat men being more predominant than fat women, that's sort of an odd american norm - look at sitcoms for examples of the couch potato husband and model-like wife.
Interesting topic...
"issues I have with respect, respectability and something that's not quite coercion, but more an encouragement to interact with people in ways that involve sexuality." -
-
Re: A different kind of freedom.
Wed, September 19, 2007 - 7:31 AMYeah, I was just thinking that on the playa, size matters considerably less than in other places. It's been enough to motivate me to finally lose the few extra pounds without feeling like I'm making myself into some kind of barbie doll.
The thing is, I believe myself to be a very sexual person, but restrain it because of the situations and directions it sends me in.
-
-
Re: A different kind of freedom.
Tue, September 18, 2007 - 6:22 PMi apologize if i'm missing your point -- i read and re-read your post many times to try to get to the essence of it. i'm generally a pretty astute reader.
i believe that you are saying that you are used to being fairly 'non-sexy' in your external behavior, but on the playa, you felt that people interacted with you differently when you dressed in a 'sexy' way and treated you as more invisible when you wore ordinary clothing, and that some were encouraging you to be more bold sexually. and you are sorting out what that implies. is that close?
i must say that i don't get your martyr reference, either, not in the context of your question, nor in what you are apparently implying about the other women in the tribe. where do martyrs come into this?
i am, however, very struck with your statement that "i try not to be anything at all." as well as in your first post when you said you didn't want to lose weight because you didn't want to "be that kind of a woman." both of these things seem to re-emphasize a desire to be invisible, to avoid people's judgments, and to not rock the boat. and while that may be safe, it doesn't really support a kick-ass life, and i'm all about a kick-ass life.
if you have read my profile and know what i do for a profession, you won't be surprised at my suggestion... how about being who you are? how about dressing and acting in as 'sexy' of a way as you feel like, and seeing what happens then?
i get that you're trying to work out what it is exactly that triggers you, or feels not quite right. but i personally believe that the way to happiness is to learn who you are, and to be that, as big and as bold as that is. you know if you like the idea of being more adventurous in how you interact with people, you know if the idea of wearing hotter clothes or however you choose to physically express your individuality is something that is exciting to you.
i also get that this isn't just about clothes, but they make a good illustration -- when i shop for clothes with people, i tell them not to choose just based on how something looks... the way to choose is to see how the clothes make you *feel* about yourself. you know, the stuff you put on and think "shit, i could never get away with wearing *that*!" but your heart is beating faster, and you know deep inside, you would love to wear that, even if it felt like a costume at first.
those are the clothes to wear, the things that make you step up, be bolder, go one step closer into the realm of discovering more of the aspects of who you are. and if that means interacting with people in a more sexual way, you go for it. and if not, that's ok too. -
-
Re: A different kind of freedom.
Tue, September 18, 2007 - 7:46 PMI'd say that the emphasis on the "Women's Movement" being about "sexuality" rather than something else, is more media generated than accurate perception. Note the early 70s focus on lesbian seperatists in the culture as a way of discrediting the movement and generating tension and space between groups of people who could have been working together for positive change.
I too am puzzled by the "martyrdom" comment.
In fact, I'm offended by it. I don't remember the particulars of how this tribe reacted to my maiming or my widowhood, and I've certainly commented on them in various places, but as a martyr, no. I've suffered and I think it's important to awknowledge it, but my wallowing days are done. -
-
Re: A different kind of freedom.
Tue, September 18, 2007 - 10:49 PMGAWDS!!! How I LOVE and Adore and Respect YOU, ALL of YOU....
and, Crypto.... darling.. I hope one day to meet you in person.. cuz if there's anyone that's been thru it and STILL "kicks ass" its YOU. even on the darkest of days you still shine like a diamond..
with great respect to all the women of tribe....
HUGS!
Bare
-
Re: A different kind of freedom.
Wed, September 19, 2007 - 9:20 AMThe "martyrdom" comment comes from the feeling I have gotten that a lot of new people come here with a load of righteous indignation, insisting that they have been wronged in some manner and that only by agreeing can anything be made right. This is not a comment on any of the active community, just a "newcomer" pattern I noticed. -
-
Re: A different kind of freedom.
Fri, September 21, 2007 - 11:51 AMthis puzzles me... i can't think of a single instance in my many readings of these posts.
can you give *any* examples? mostly, i think women come here for guidance, validation, support... not to bleed all over. -
-
Re: A different kind of freedom.
Fri, September 21, 2007 - 2:22 PMHm. Perhaps it's just a general impression I get from reading this and other forums. Now that I think about it, you're right about this group being lower-drama than most. -
-
Re: A different kind of freedom.
Fri, September 21, 2007 - 2:32 PMin that case, look within for that you focus on...
-
-
-
-
-
Re: A different kind of freedom.
Wed, September 19, 2007 - 7:32 AMNo, actually I'm saying that non-playa I'm considered quite sexy unless I deliberately do things to tone this down. The sexiness is a serious issue as I find people interacting with my body rather than my mind.
-
-
-
Re: A different kind of freedom.
Fri, September 21, 2007 - 12:48 PMI respect that you had your particular kind of experience, but remember that your own ideas and attitudes about things create your personal experience. As with all of us
I went around topless most of the time and had very few "uncomfortable" encounters. I'm confident in my nudity, have no issues with it, and I never had guys taking pictures of me (without my permission). Once or twice I noticed that guys came and flirted with me, but that happens when anyone is attractive. But basically, I felt pretty comfortable in my own self, therefore everything around me was pretty comfortable too.
What happens "out there" is always a reflection of what is "in here."
Cheers! -
-
Re: A different kind of freedom.
Fri, September 21, 2007 - 2:33 PManybody hear an echo? without... within...
-
-
-
Re: A different kind of freedom.
Tue, September 18, 2007 - 5:17 PMI think it is a matter of perspective..
I often feel that women view freedom in terms of our abilities, and the restrictions...
I do feel that men view women's freedom more in terms of sexuality...
I am probably over generalizing,,, but I do feel that jobs, politics and even in some relationships, the factors tend to be about power and money, and that leads men to feel more desired.. so they in turn view power in terms of sexualtiy.
I think women think differently... and I think men think differently,,,
but this is just my possibly warped opinion... I've had short hair, and long hair.. and I have definatly been treated much differently since my hair has been long... -
-
Re: A different kind of freedom.
Tue, September 18, 2007 - 5:51 PMUm.... curious as to why you thought the way we view attractive people on the playa would be any different than in the default world?
As for Women's Liberation , that can be paraphrased very easily- "Sister's are doing it for themselves."
-
Re: A different kind of freedom.
Wed, September 19, 2007 - 7:34 AMSexuality is a form of power, and quite a motivating one at that. I don't think a lot of women realize this because sometimes it's the only power they can wield. Of course, every sort of power that you can use to influence people causes them to interact with you differently. -
-
Re: A different kind of freedom.
Fri, September 21, 2007 - 11:53 AMinterestingly, i *feel* more powerful the more freely i feel i can express my sexuality.
i am what i am... and i love to share it and flaunt it to the world!
and why the hell not?! -
-
Re: A different kind of freedom.
Fri, September 21, 2007 - 2:41 PM...because when I'm looking at some guys scratching their heads while working on something and I think I can help, I get the most dismissive of brush-offs? (It actually happened.) My greatest contributions are not my tits.
-
-
-
Re: A different kind of freedom.
Wed, September 19, 2007 - 10:27 AMYeah... It's sort of a harsh essentialization to say that men view "women's freedom" as "attractive women are free to have sex with me".
Everyone couches things in terms of their own wants/needs/desires. What people remember is what people want to remember, and media and advertisers manufacture want. I like the encouraged BM culture because it encourages people to "make their own" - desire included.
I wonder what my steadfast insistence on wearing long hair has to do with anything. I realized when I was working in finance that I'd never advance unless I cut my hair when I looked around and noticed that all the women in any sort of a leadership role wore their hair very short. How have people treated you differently since you've had long hair? -
-
Re: A different kind of freedom.
Wed, September 19, 2007 - 10:51 AMThe hair - and men wonder why we are so damn emotionally attached to it.
Absolutely makes a difference on how treated. I keep mine long and will not change it into the standard bob but that's just cause I like longer hair more than myself with short hair. I don't think it has to be done. I wonder if it's because the short haircuts are more masculine and that's still the default in certain professions? Or is it just because women in leadership roles have more to deal with than drying/styling long hair? It could be totally practical reasons that morph into a "uniform" and subconsciously people take similar qualities to mean "leader".
I think the company makes a difference. Look at this link for the top 50 women in business money.cnn.com/popups/2006...omen/34.html most have shorter hair but certainly not all. -
-
Re: A different kind of freedom.
Wed, September 19, 2007 - 11:37 AMYeah. When I was 8, I didn't take very good care of my hair. My mother, at one point, threatened to cut it if I didn't take better care of it. I bolted and she chased me around the house and yard trying to tell me that it wouldn't have to come to that. (Which is particularly funny considering my mother was a serious no-nonsense sort of person.) Long hair isn't just a style preference for me, it's part of my identity.
I've thought about the "hair care" aspect of rising to the top, but I don't think it'd fly. A lot of the serious business men I've known generally get silly expensive haircuts and mess with the hair just as much as women. (I admit I'm a sucker for a guy with an good haircut.) Also, looking at those women you posted, they're not exactly wearing "low maintenance" styles.
I think you might be onto something with the "uniform" look, though. One of the reasons I have to rejoice in being a woman is that when dressing up, the men all have to wear these very similar looking suits, whereas women have a vast array of color and styles to work with, with relatively few limitations.
I think you're right and people generally trust the predictable more. (Especially in finance!) It raises interesting questions about the entire concept that we're doing this for, though.
-
Re: A different kind of freedom.
Wed, September 19, 2007 - 12:18 PMthanks for that link, i looked at every woman on the list -- as an executive recruiter, it's always fascinating to see these power women. i'd say that only about 10% of resumes i see for senior positions are from women, and it gets discouraging sometimes. i'd guesstimate that 80% or more of my placements are men, because there just aren't the qualified women that i wish i could find. this is a reminder to me that, slow as it seems, there are many women in, or poised to be in, the top jobs in business.
what i noticed from the photos (and laughing at the irony that i'm checking out their hair, makeup and jewelry ;^) is that these women had certain looks that were consistent with their industries.
the ones in very male-dominated fields like pharmaceuticals and finance seem to dress more simply. the ones in more self-generated businesses, like oprah and martha, or more gender-balanced industries like ecommerce, dress more individually and stylishly, and show a little more of their feminine side. and the old-fashioned industries had some old-fashioned women. two of them stood out because they had what appeared to be high-maintenance hair and makeup, which i would not expect in a senior exec.
when i worked in an office every day (i usually work from home in my pajamas now ;^), i came up with a uniform, a few basics that set a tone with the my clients and candidates for who i was. good black trousers, neutral colored sweater sets. i was still unusual looking within that context, with stretched ears and one visible tattoo (that i've had since i was 18, so it's 35 years old now!), and wearing distinctive jewelry... i was never in a grey suit with white shirt, but toned down and always within the limit of appropriate.
now, of course, i have dreadlocks and there's no hiding that. i once met a high-level business networking contact who actually said to me "of course, you can't work in the corporate world with that hair, can you?" and i told her that it is my strong belief that what is happening in our world in general -- including the world of business -- is that we are becoming freer to be individuals.. and there are some of us who are what i think of as pioneers.
i do indeed interact in the corporate world with "that hair" though admittedly much of what i do is virtual nowadays. when i do in-person meetings, i wear simple business clothes so not to add to add any extra distraction. they may have a first reaction to my appearance, but when they talk to me, any doubts generally disappear, and in fact, i think my clients like me even more because i'm not cookie-cutter.
the pioneers are the ones who come to work with our tattoos or ear piercings or weird hair AND we are solid, experienced and productive in what we do. we make no apologies for being who we are, and no pretending about it. we are at the front of an army of people who want to be themselves at work.
the days of blue suits with bows at the neck are gone, and the doors are being opened wider and wider to be self-expressed and outside-the-mold in our work lives. oprah is a pioneer like that, dressing how she wants and changing the world, and was notably the only woman with cleavage in those photos.
i say be who you are, and have your work speak for itself. if your appearance distracts from your ability to do your work, then tone it down to be more productive, but don't assume that we have to be nondescript or look like a man to get credibility. credibility comes from how we express our personal power, and sometimes looking unique really supports that. and sometimes, it becomes necessary up to remind people that you may be a different gender, but you expect to be treated as a peer.
anyone remember that mad tv skit with the ditzy blonde valley-girl type in the mini-skirt who was actually a doctor, and her patients were totally unable to figure it out? that would be an example of going too far, but it was hilarious! -
-
Re: A different kind of freedom.
Wed, September 19, 2007 - 12:55 PMre: professional appearance...
I could probably write 3 pages on that. :) There are so many aspects at play. In a nutshell, you can recognize the trends and adopt them to manipulate people with your appearance, or you can feel victim to them and oppressed by them (or just as bad, clueless to them). For example, if you know people take you more seriously when you wear a suit, then wear a suit when you want to hold their attention more or want to elevate their perception of respect. It then becomes you using appearance as a tool, rather than being pigeonholed.
Also, the more you've proven yourself in your career, the more liberties you can take with your appearance. Finally, when it comes to professional dress (or hair or makeup) it's all about subtleties. You can still dress stylishly and femininely, it's just a matter of degrees and learning a broader definition of what those words mean. When you arm yourself with knowledge you can use these things to your benefit. :)
"i say be who you are, and have your work speak for itself. if your appearance distracts from your ability to do your work, then tone it down to be more productive, but don't assume that we have to be nondescript or look like a man to get credibility. credibility comes from how we express our personal power, and sometimes looking unique really supports that. and sometimes, it becomes necessary up to remind people that you may be a different gender, but you expect to be treated as a peer. "
very well said, leslie. great as always. :)
-
Re: A different kind of freedom.
Wed, September 19, 2007 - 1:09 PM"the days of blue suits with bows at the neck are gone," Huzzah! I was never able to figure out how to tie those bows properly anyway. I found the tie fake-out to be truly bizarre and frankly preferred wearing actual ties.
Did you notice that the women with the high-maintenance look work for places like Avon? It's interesting that you view e-commerce as gender balanced. My experience has been otherwise. Then again, it still makes sense that the women who from there were a little more outlandish. (I used to work for a woman who managed to find the most FABULOUS shoes.)
I've myself come up with a "uniform" for interviewing in the valley (that always seems to work) that includes some dress pants with loud stripes and an interesting blouse or sweater. It's important in the industry to uniformly assert that you are not wearing a uniform, without really making too much of a departure from it, but it sounds like you're there already. I have recently decided that my blue hair is something I definitely want to keep. It makes too many people want to smile. (something I never expected when I first did it) It really only detracts for a minute at most.
I think your comment about the cleavage is significant, though. Where does that fit in with the dreads, tattoos, etc? Do you think someone would come across as a "pioneer" if they showed up for an interview showing a lot of cleavage? I think part of the problem is it distracts for more than a minute or two.
-
Re: A different kind of freedom.
Fri, September 21, 2007 - 12:15 PMleslie said: "it is my strong belief that what is happening in our world in general -- including the world of business -- is that we are becoming freer to be individuals.. and there are some of us who are what i think of as pioneers. ... the pioneers are the ones who come to work with our tattoos or ear piercings or weird hair AND we are solid, experienced and productive in what we do. we make no apologies for being who we are, and no pretending about it. we are at the front of an army of people who want to be themselves at work."
taking it back to burning man: that's one of the things that i adore about hanging out with the burner community... i can dress in a way that i feel unable in my work environment: the public school system. here i can thrill at the experience of fishnet stockings, four-inch high platforms, pleated mini-skirts, lacy bras alone (or nothing at all -- *gasp*!), and crazy hats. i revel at the chance to let the little girl out for a change, to wear hot pink (not something i'd be caught dead in out in the default world) or to sport an aqua tutu (with nothing underneath -- *double gasp*!!) or even to expose the beautiful little tattoo that i positioned so strategically to be hidden by my teeny bikini.
burning man and associated community has allowed me a safe place to celebrate my femininity and flaunt my naughty side. i've scoured racks and racks of thrift stores galore to find the most outrageous, the most provocative, and yes, the most flattering and sexually adventurous clothing i can find.
why? *because i can!!!!!!* ... for a change. my default life does not condone such behavior. thank god/dess i have an outlet to let *me* play, cuz it ain't out here, where teachers are held to one of the highest standards of our general communities.
and regarding the attention i get: why wouldn't somebody react to my playful, spirited attitude that i wear along with my 'burnerwear'?! ... my whole aura reeks with the joyfulness of my attire. and i, in turn, celebrate the joyful abandon with which others get to express their not-so-damn-normal sides, and applaud those who have the courage and ability to do so in *their* default worlds!
perhaps each 'pioneer' will help us diminish the level to which we *judge* one another by our appearance rather than our essence. i, for one, encourage all to take the risks within the burner community that we may not be able to afford out there.
-
-
Re: A different kind of freedom.
Fri, September 21, 2007 - 2:32 PMInteresting. I like your take on "taking risks". After so many years of struggling it's
Tell me, do you ever have those concerns that anything will spill over back into the default world? You mentioned that you felt good about not having any unauthorized photography, but do you think reports ever come back? I can imagine that dealing with kids, you have to instill a certain amount of "respectability", and straying too far to the other side of that line can be pretty hard on your career, although I'm thinking there's a whole lot less "gray area" associated with it. -
-
Re: A different kind of freedom.
Fri, September 21, 2007 - 2:35 PM(After so many years of struggling it's... hard to remember to finish a sentence)
After so many years of struggling it's hard to let go of certain attitudes.
Although my thoughts weren't over concerns on what to wear... There were a couple of times I wore some quite risque things, which is what gave me pause in the difference in how others responded to me. -
-
Re: A different kind of freedom.
Fri, September 21, 2007 - 2:47 PMrisk is in the eye of the beholder, i suppose. some people might find it risky to play with fire... i relish it, passionately. some people might find it risky to play with certain recreational substances... i certainly do, and behave accordingly. some people take risks by bicycling on the playa without enough water or sunscreen, or perhaps without a helmet! we all have our own tolerances and no-wo/man-zones. what envelope(s) are you willing to push today?
for me, going sunclad (mostly) was a big personal milestone, hence a 'risk'... and am i ever glad i leaped that one!!! there are even photos floating around to mark the occasion, and i am proud of them rather than ashamed or afraid. why? because i don't feel i did anything wrong or bad. i choose to judge my own behavior. do i feel i've put any of my students in danger of discovering photos of me? absolutely not. am i willing to suffer the ramifications if/should anybody discover them and try to tarnish my 'image' with them? certainly, or i never would have chosen to take the risk.
this is my life. this is how i want to lead it. i trust in the brilliance of the universe. i believe that whatever happens, it will be for a reason, and it will be okay.
naive? perhaps. or perhaps i'm just more enlightened than many...
who's to say?
:)*
-
-
Re: A different kind of freedom.
Fri, September 21, 2007 - 2:38 PMshort answer: yes.
so why risk it? because it's important for me to have a safe place to be the real TRUE me. i don't want to lead my life out of fear. i love myself too much.
i want *a different kind of freedom* ... the freedom to be *authentic*, inside and out.
if you're interested, here's a link to my vision statement. it has served me well for nearly a decade, without a single edit desired. people.tribe.net/5234f615-...6da9f069cd
love and light,
namaste to all,
:)*
spark*l is as spark*l does
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Re: A different kind of freedom.
Tue, September 18, 2007 - 5:38 PMI wrote a long, intensely eloquent response, and then the internets ate it. Poo!
Well, here's a shorter, crappier version:
The conflict you feel is based on stereotypical interpretations of the words "sexy" and "respect." A lot of women here in LA think that sexy means big boobs, bleach blonde hair, and a ditzy personality. And these women think that it earns them respect.
But what is respect? Is it makingn people fear you? Making them listen to you? Trust you? Do things for you? Based on a person's definition- maybe they ARE getting respect.
I don't believe that "sexy" and "respect" are mutually exclusive at all. In my interpretation, they work very well together. A woman who is strong, curious, intelligent, directed, who takes good care of herself, treats people kindly, and has a strong sense of style is VERY sexy. These are the same things that make me respect her- I want to know about her, I want to hear her opinions, I want to follow her lead.
But then, I'm a queer woman, so perhaps I have a different definition than the "typical" straight man.
As far as engaging in sexual activity based on one's appeal- Sexuality is an intrinsic part of the human experience. To deny yourself sexual expression for any reason other than personal priorities is to deny part of the self and a place in the world. This is why people think that sexuality should be shared- just like any other talent, it gives joy to others. A beautiful singer- you want to hear sing. It fosters community and group identity. This is how it is with art- art is based on objects and commodities- but the result is one of community unification.
When a person denies sexuality- people interpret it as unnatural- something that is based on societal mores, not true preference. Particularly with women- because we are the sexual objects in society, to NOT express sexuality is to not engage in society.
I say all this understanding the "for better or worse" implications.
and again, it goes back to your definition of sexy. I love my body and I love to use it. But I loathe being treated as a sexual object by those I don't want to engage with. It's the problem of being a woman in this world- because our bodies are commodified without our consent. You can't decide who can think you are sexy and who can't. It's not up to you. This is something I've had to deal with a lot in my own life, because I am a very sexual person but can't stand dirty old men thinking of me that way.
Ultimately, I think that sexuality is not something you owe to the world- it's something you owe to yourself. But people can only interpret what they see- so if they see you as someone who doesn't like her body or believe that she is sexy, then that's the way people will think you really are- which is where the "repression thing" comes from. Regardless of your intimate expression- we all only ever know each other by what we put into the world.
-
-
Re: A different kind of freedom.
Wed, September 19, 2007 - 7:42 AMYour comment about being queer is interesting. Some of the women I respect most are queer, and I suspect that's because of the outlook that women have towards self-presentation. I tend to see less objectification and more concern for depth in these relationships. In a lot of regards I do kind of wish I were attracted to women.
I'd love to be a more sexual person, and interact with others in a more sexual way. I've had a series of bad experiences with men, though, in terms of objectification and so forth, and frankly, I don't want to be put in that box again. Until I get the power issues worked out, I'd rather abstain. And I'd like to be respected whether I abstain or not. Y'know, as a human being?
-
-
Re: A different kind of freedom.
Tue, September 18, 2007 - 5:42 PMWow, may I say, you have some "stuff" floating around in your head and Me thinks thou doth protest too much...
ok,, that's probably not very fair... as it seems you truly are seeking to find YOU in the context of "expectations"
Valkyrie said: "My question is: does freedom have to come in terms of sexuality"
in a word, NO!
in the 60's there was a sexual revolution taking place, women were finding their freedoms from expectations; becoming a wife and mother, stay at home raise the kids, etc. wasn't the only choice anymore...
in the 70's we were free to express our sexuality... and certainly some were using THAT to their own personal advantage... women were not, and to a large extent are still not, hired for jobs in "male dominant" areas, nor are they paid for the same kind of work on the level men are... and women discovered (long before this even) that using their sexuality could influence most specifically the male dominant society....
the 80's saw women taking control and finding new freedoms, to join the military and be allowed to do the jobs that were previously Male dominant for one...
and I can assure you... we were NOT getting THOSE jobs based on our sexuality...
so. seems to me, if a person leads out with "sexuality" in any of its many forms then that is what will be noticed,
some people almost scream out their sexuality, almost as an 'I dare ya" and then are, in many cases. rejected based on their own presentation of themselves, and then can claim they were "sexualized" and then discriminated against...
I believe it's more about self actualization. how we perceive ourselves to be....
psikoloji.fisek.com.tr/maslow/self.htm
present the TRUE and authentic you... what's REAL, with no apology, and no expectation...
if you make it sexual.. then it will become such...
Self Assurance and Confidence is sexy, and how one presents themselves is what is mosy usually perceived by the other person...
if one "hides" behind a cloak of anonymity, then they remain anonymous....
Come out... Be your own Fabulous self and try not to think so hard on what someone else looks like and is being accepted as....
they may in fact be struggling to be noticed in their space, and presenting in such a way that one would never know they had their own windows of self doubts and insecurities..
we do have the freedom to BE, it's in our own perspective we get lost to the details....
Namaste
Bare
-
-
Re: A different kind of freedom.
Wed, September 19, 2007 - 10:05 AMWhen I was in school, I took a leadership role in a women's organization for my field, which many argued was the hardest undergraduate degree you could earn. We were a serious minority and our numbers were, and still are, falling. They have fallen from a national average of a little over 14% in the late 80's when I was in school to a current 11%. Not exactly improvement from the 30+% we had back around WW II. Then again, those were special circumatances. There were a lot of people with quick answers that I didn't really agree with, including the women's studies folks.
I certainly had my own issues. Social pressure to spend more time enjoying myslf, family pressure to just find a man and be done with this nonsense. Many of my professors did not want women in their classrooms. Worst of all there was a sort of discomfort by my peers, as not someone who belonged in their boys locker room. In short, I recognized that the problem was a very subtle one.
I was having a conversation with someone I had met on the playa and complaining about how hard it was to get involved volunteering for art projects and having my skills even close to utilized. He was nice, but rather dismissive, suggesting that sometimes it's hard to find a good role for volunteers. Later in the conversation, it happened to come up that I had a degree in electrical engineering. He looked like I'd hit him in the stomach; like I had somehow violated him.
Now I'm only guessing when it comes to why I get that sort of reaction. That was the most extreme, but it wasn't the only time it happened. Maybe I don't look very bright? I would like to think it's not because of the stretch velvet I'm so fond of wearing...
I can't help but think about the Muslim women I know who choose to wear the head scarves and the concealing clothing. They argue that it allows them to express their personhood instead of their bodies. I don't think I'll ever forget my friend describing how liberating it felt when she went to Egypt and chose to wear the Burkha. How free from the objectifying gaze it made her. People forget that the prophet's wife was a wealthy and powerful businesswoman in her own right.
Or perhaps my own opinion of myself is overinflated in that I think I should expect that kind of respect. And enjoy my sexuality too. -
-
Re: A different kind of freedom.
Thu, September 20, 2007 - 8:49 AM> Worst of all there was a sort of discomfort by my peers,
> as not someone who belonged in their boys locker room.
> In short, I recognized that the problem was a very subtle one.
I think this is something women encounter whenever they enter into spaces that have been marked as "manly". I get a similar feeling in the weight room at my gym (obviously this is less intense than having to deal with it the whole time you are in school and in your career)--because for whatever reason lifting weights is seen as "masculine" and the idea that I might want to enjoy the sport is seen as suspect. It's as though the dudes felt my very presence in "their" space was taking away from their masculinity.
And like you I wish I didn't have to say anything about it, ever. I want to just go in there and do my thing and the only conversation I want to have with anyone is "can I work in between your sets" but because I am a woman in a masculine space that option is not available to me. I have to in some way deal with it.
Some of the answers I've seen in this thread about changing your attitude or getting more confidence or getting self-actualized or whatever, really irk me. I can be as self actualized as I want to be and dudes will still come up to me in the gym to "inform" me that deadlifting will make my uterus fall out. Eventually the dudes in the free weight room get used to me and it's more OK, but then I take on the odious role of Representative of All Women Everywhere.
> Later in the conversation, it happened to come up that
> I had a degree in electrical engineering. He looked
> like I'd hit him in the stomach; like I had somehow violated him.
Electrical engineering isn't very lady-like. I'm sure you must have punctured the poor dude's reality bubble. Maybe he went away with a slightly more open mind.
> can't help but think about the Muslim women I know who
> choose to wear the head scarves and the concealing clothing.
> They argue that it allows them to express their personhood
> instead of their bodies.
I've actually thought about wearing that kind of stuff at BM. But it's a bit of a double bind. Either you hide your sexual nature in the hopes of having your personhood acknowledge (and are instead mostly ignored), or you let your sexual nature be visible and then all that people acknowledge is your sexual nature. It's extremely frustrating. It's not always exactly like that, but it's like that enough of the time to make me annoyed. Still it's no different than what I encounter in the everyday world, so ti's not exactly a shock (just a dissapointment that the experimental community falls into the same traps). -
-
Re: A different kind of freedom.
Thu, September 20, 2007 - 9:55 AM"Some of the answers I've seen in this thread about changing your attitude or getting more confidence or getting self-actualized or whatever, really irk me. I can be as self actualized as I want to be and dudes will still come up to me in the gym to "inform" me that deadlifting will make my uterus fall out."
I, for one, was not saying that more confidence and balance will eliminate sexism. If you re-read my posts you'll see I was saying that changing ourselves changes the way people react to us. Since we can't control what others will think and do, we need to look inward and better ourselves. Yes, there will always be jerks, as I said earlier. However, how you chose to respond to them, the degree to which you internalize their issues, the degree to which you feel limited by it, the degree to which you let it shape you -- those make the difference between feeling well-rounded as a person and feeling limited by life. You can go through life trying to be less visible or invisible so people ignore you, but that only makes you a bigger target because antagonizers sense the fear and uncertainty. Or you can carve out a space for yourself and stand your ground, making you less of a target to begin with and refuse to let other's stupidity shape you. In short: you can feel victimized by it or you can kick ass and take names.
Yes, there are some crappy people out there, both men and women (for the record one of the most sexist people I ever met was a gay man, and I've met plenty of women who were as ignorant and offensive as some men when it comes to gender issues). Yes sexism exists. Yes, I have experienced a metric ass ton of it in wide variety of forms, yes I still encounter it. But I'm not going to hide who I am, deny my sexuality, feel pigeon-holed by some antiquated definition of woman because some people are idiots. People will take as much as you let them, metaphorically speaking (not addressing something like sex crimes). Only you can decide how much that is.
As far as I could tell this thread wasn't asking to commiserate about how unfair the world is, it was asking for help in dealing with those issues (which has been offered many times from what I can see). That comes back to my original statement above: you can't change them, so you can only change yourself to better the situation. No it's not easy. Yes, it's a life-long journey. But personally I find that a whole lot better than the alternative.
Though perhaps I've misunderstood and this was meant to be a complaining/commiserating thread, not a solution or evaluation thread. -
-
Re: A different kind of freedom.
Thu, September 20, 2007 - 11:45 AM"Yes sexism exists. Yes, I have experienced a metric ass ton of it in wide variety of forms, yes I still encounter it. But I'm not going to hide who I am, deny my sexuality, feel pigeon-holed by some antiquated definition of woman because some people are idiots. "
absofuckinlutely. -
-
Re: A different kind of freedom.
Thu, September 20, 2007 - 12:19 PMWell, sure, you can decide that you're not going to hide who you are, but then you are acknowledging that you'll take one of two tradeoffs. I'd really rather not be eased out of the boys locker room and keep my career going. How much can you get away with before it breaks down? How much sexual representation is OK for you to make clear your gender and sexual identity? -
-
Re: A different kind of freedom.
Thu, September 20, 2007 - 12:40 PMValkyrie,
You seem set on believing this is an either/or, all or nothing situation and also that sexual representation is the same as or the sum of gender identity. This thread seems more a way for you to continue those beliefs and seek confirmation of them, rather than engage in a discussion on it. Therefore I don't really see the point in me continuing participation in the thread and will follow Crypto's lead. But I do wish you luck in dealing with these issues in your life. -
-
Re: A different kind of freedom.
Thu, September 20, 2007 - 12:53 PMSo what you're saying is that I'm not working in a boys locker room? That I don't represent all "women engineers" in other people's eyes? That if I just feel better about myself then everyone will know that my uterus won't fall out?
We can accept, deny, decry or express outrage at other people's reaction. If we deny them, it's only one way of dealing with them. I'd like to hear others. Does accepting other people's behavior require me to accept my lot in life as a woman? You're saying that I should just wear whatever I feel like and accept the consequences of other people's opinions that put me back in my "rightful" place? That sounds really self-defeating if you ask me. -
-
This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.
Re: A different kind of freedom.
Thu, September 20, 2007 - 3:31 PMI don't see how you read any of that in her post at all. -
-
Re: A different kind of freedom.
Thu, September 20, 2007 - 4:54 PMThe point is I feel like I'm being told to "let how other people react to you go and just be yourself." Or am I missing something? -
-
Re: A different kind of freedom.
Thu, September 20, 2007 - 6:29 PMV, I hope that you don't mind a few words from a male technogeek here.
Your issues are real and hardly limited to the techie world. What I'd like to bring in from the male side is that not all men split women into sexual vs. intelligent camps. Personally I appreciate a woman who is confident in herself as a woman and is confident in herself as a competent professional, and I've seen the percentage of men with this attitude increase over the years.
It's also too simple to say that one should ignore the opinions of others. It's human to be concerned about others and one's position in the local tribe (even technogeeks form tribes). I feel that the way we cope is to establish alliances with people who are supportive, and that we succeed in this by offering reciprocity.
You are not wrong to feel the way you do, but you do seem unhappy and unsure of how to reach a balance. Reaching out to women is very good, but I also urge you to believe that there are some men in your surround who could be your allies. -
-
Re: A different kind of freedom.
Fri, September 21, 2007 - 10:02 AMI see that. It's a little frustrating trying to find such men, although I do occasionally stumble upon them. The difficulty is twofold: first, it's a little insulting to a fellow to ask if he is or is the sort of person I have in mind. Second (and this I discovered the hard way) is everyone will say that they're "not that way" when under all the intellectually "I should not be that way", emotionally they just can't reconcile the image of a sexy woman with the image of a peer and colleague. It was a lesson I learned the hard way with my first ex-fiancee that taught me not to ask questions so much as observe.
Any tips on things to look for in men who would be supportive?
I'll admit that these are questions I've been struggling with for years. I know there are no easy answers. But it struck me that this was the group of people to come up with a different outlook on how to approach them. -
-
Re: A different kind of freedom.
Fri, September 21, 2007 - 12:09 PM"Any tips on things to look for in men who would be supportive? "
This is rather simple to me - look at their actions.
How do they treat other women in their life.
Are they nasty to a waitress for no reason - they are an ass.
Are they supportive? Do they listen, discuss, respect differing opinions, etc. Especially with differing opinions. If they dismiss your ideas and only think they are right...they are an ass. They may very well be right, but you both may be so I mean the auto dismiss.
Do they have female friends that are in their life that they relate to?
See how they treat their friends n loved ones is a basic starting point. Not just his mother, but does he have friends that are female, successful, educated and similar in self to you.
There are tons of red flags in my mind .
I've never asked that kind of a question of a person.
trust your intuition about people but let them show you not "tell" you what they are about.
-
-
Re: A different kind of freedom.
Fri, September 21, 2007 - 2:39 PMWell, most of these things it's really hard to get a handle on in a working relationship. And most guys aren't an outright ass, or the boss would be on them. Ideas are dismissed most often simply by being ignored. Some of the nicest guys I've known have been remarkably sexist. Some of the guys I've known who I expected to be really sexist (like the devout Southern Baptist boss I had once) were surprisingly supportive.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Re: A different kind of freedom.
Thu, September 20, 2007 - 12:08 PMI can be as self actualized as I want to be and dudes will still come up to me in the gym to "inform" me that deadlifting will make my uterus fall out.<<
Actually, to be fair, a whole generation of men and women were told this little tidbit of information by the medical profession. I have had older women tell this when I have lifted heavy boxes at work.
My friend was working in Ireland a few years ago and was absolutely forbidden to change or move beer kegs, as the management were deathly afraid that her lady parts would somehow completely break down if she lifted anything over twenty pounds.
No matter that child birth and labor put way more stress and pressure on that part of our bodies then any dead lifting or beer keg changing could ever do.
SO yeah.... it's pretty funny that people are rather ignorant on that account still.
-
-
-
-
Re: A different kind of freedom.
Tue, September 18, 2007 - 8:01 PMValkyrie,
I'm having trouble getting my head around the point of your post, but one thing that keeps popping out at me is that you seem to be saying you wish to be completely sexless, as opposed to finding a comfortable place with your sexuality. (particularly with statements like "I try not to be anything at all.") I really don't understand the argument that one's sexual identity is somehow at odds with their freedom or respect, unless they are imposing that limitation on themselves. -
-
Re: A different kind of freedom.
Wed, September 19, 2007 - 10:30 AMI think a part of it is that many men are well aware of the power a sexually appealing woman has over them and tend to shunt off anyone who wields this power (passively or actively) to a "safe" area where they still hold motivational force, but are not able to strongly influence attitude or opinion.
I don't like to be sent to that safe area, isolated by terms of my body's influence.
-
-
Re: A different kind of freedom.
Tue, September 18, 2007 - 11:54 PM> I found issues to be even more pronounced on the playa.
If by "this issue" you mean women being viewed primarly as sex objects, I have to agree with you. While BM is an alternative community, it retains many of the negative aspects of the default world--in this instance sexism. Like you, I find that sexism is more pronounced at BM than ordinarily.
> My question is: does freedom have to come in terms of sexuality?
> Does a woman who is "sexy", or (heaven forbid!) "good in bed" deprive
> the world of some sort of value by not engaging?
There seems to be an inherent assumption in the phrasing of these questions that a woman's value comes from what she does or does not do for men, as opposed to who she is in and of herself.
> Why is it that
> sexuality seems to overshadow the other positive attributes a woman may have?
Because men are the default for "human being" in our current patriarchal system, and they are trained from boyhood to treat women primarily as objects for the satisfaction of their sexual desire. This doesn't change at Burning Man.
> Discussing myself appearing to someone as "sexy".
> As if this is an important thing to aspire to. I aspire to be respected,
> which isn't the same thing at all.
I think that the pressure to be "sexy", at BM, or any other time, is just a sly way to keep women firmly in our role as objects for male delectation, as opposed to human beings in our own right. Being sexual is different than being "sexy". "Sexy" is for being the object of the gaze, key word, object. Sexual is being the agent of one's own desire, as much as one desires or does not desire, and arising out of one's own human urges, and having little to do with supposed norms. One thing BM does have going for it over default is that it seems to be easier to be genuinely sexual.
> Hearing someone explain that a woman who was not
> frequently sexually active was repressed and that it
> was some great tragedy if she were good in bed and
> not opening herself up for more sex. As if she owed it to the world.
This goes back to the idea of women being not fully human, but rather objects for satisfying male sexual urges. If you think of a woman who is good in bed in the same way as you do as of a very fast and fun car or a strong and beautiful car, well, of course it should be put to use! But if on the other hand you see a woman as a human being, then the question is what she wants to do and what makes her happy, not what she owes the world as a public glory-hole.
I have no solutions to this problem at Burning Man because it's a problem that carries over from the default world.
I do feel/understand your frustration.
-
-
Re: A different kind of freedom.
Wed, September 19, 2007 - 10:52 AM"There seems to be an inherent assumption in the phrasing of these questions that a woman's value comes from what she does or does not do for men, as opposed to who she is in and of herself."
That's it. I really really hate to take on a "feminist" attitude and do not consider myself a feminist... but to be held separate from the "default person" is contrary to everything I have been told a person is. It's hard to see, because it's a question of how you think about someone or something, rather than what you think about them.
I can't help but think that the basis for the subtle pressure for women to be sexy is of a spectator nature. (kinda like the Buddha nature, only different.) Quite possibly the most offensive sexual attitude I've had from men (and being a strong-type woman, I get this a lot) is one of "come over here girl and do me!" *shudder* -
-
Re: A different kind of freedom.
Wed, September 19, 2007 - 11:27 AMI've been trying to be gracious when reading this thread, but over and over, every post you make seems to say the same thing:
instead of owning your sexuality and body image, you are allowing yourself to be a victim to other people's perceptions and reactions. You are allowing yourself to be penned in by your own perceptions of what is right and wrong as a woman. And you are placing the blame on others, rather than finding a peaceful balance within yourself.
"I haven't lost the weight I put on during an extended disability because I don't want to be seen as that kind of woman."
and what kind of woman is that? you're judging there. you're implying that people who want to take care of their appearance or feel better when they lose weight are a lesser quality of person. That's a sexist view that women who are attentive to their appearance or sexuality are vapid or slutty.
"lose the few extra pounds without feeling like I'm making myself into some kind of barbie doll. "
This sounds to me like you're struggling with body issues and serious judgments. People should do what makes them feel good about their body, without subjecting themselves to such narrow views that you only have 2 choices: mindless barbie doll or overweight.
"The sexiness is a serious issue as I find people interacting with my body rather than my mind."
again, I just keep getting these clear signals from your posts that you are having big issues with your own sexuality and your body. That's something you need to look inward to resolve, not outward. The problem is not society or other people, it's your own perception and judgments about your actions. I'll venture that if you stop seeking approval from people you'll begin to own yourself. Start commanding people's interaction instead of passively being led by it. Start setting boundaries. If you act like a quivering rabbit when it comes to people's responses to you, hiding your body or sexuality people will sense it and you are not going to get the respect you are seeking.
"Sexuality is a form of power, and quite a motivating one at that. I don't think a lot of women realize this because sometimes it's the only power they can wield."
No, sexual INFLUENCE is a form of power. Sexuality is a normal human state, some are more at peace with it than others. And there are many many other forms of power women can wield. Just because someone responds to you in a sexual manner (or you perceive it to be so) doesn't mean you're in a vulnerable state. You seem to be giving power to people instead of commanding it for yourself.
"'ve had a series of bad experiences with men, though, in terms of objectification and so forth... I don't want to be put in that box again"
Again, personal issues with gender roles, body image, sexuality. Not all men are bad creatures to be feared. Yes some people will be jerks and treat you like an object. How you respond determines whether you are under their thumb or not. You are not the only women who has ever had to deal with these issues. If you don't want to be put in that box, then don't be. Change your response. Don't internalize their garbage. It sounds like in an attempt to avoid one box you are simply creating another for yourself.
"That's it. I really really hate to take on a "feminist" attitude and do not consider myself a feminist... "
Sorry, but again another judgment. That feminist is somehow a bad word. You know, if you have self-respect and desire others to treat you with respect then you are somehow over demanding, an unappealing woman, whatever. Which is exactly what many sexist people believe, the same sexist people you seem to be wanting to avoid. Frankly, EVERY WOMAN should consider themselves a feminist. There are many different feminists movements, but I can't even fathom why someone would feel that they aren't worthy enough to expect equal treatment and respect.
I don't mean to be harsh here, but it just sounds like you are continually buying into the very things you claim to dislike and passing along the same judgments that you feel victim to. There are ways to get more comfortable with yourself if you wish to discuss that, but it has to start with you taking ownership and dropping the victim role.
-
-
Re: A different kind of freedom.
Wed, September 19, 2007 - 12:15 PMPerhaps what I didn't state explicitly enough was that I'm not expecting the rest of the world to change for me - more that I'm wanting to talk through issues in my own mind (that I think others might want to think through as well) and hoping to get input from others who might have put some thought into this. I wouldn't call them "big issues with sexuality", but this whole thread is about issues I am having with sexuality, gender roles and all that jazz - although I consider it just one facet of my own personality to improve, and not life-changing. Y'know, something interesting to chat about online? The comment on martyrdom was a statement that I am not wanting to die for a cause that is bigger than myself. I just want to grow a bit personally.
Is that to self-serving or trivial for this crowd?
"This sounds to me like you're struggling with body issues and serious judgments. People should do what makes them feel good about their body, without subjecting themselves to such narrow views that you only have 2 choices: mindless barbie doll or overweight."
That's an interesting assessment. I generally try to avoid binary oppositions, as I find most of them to be false, created only for the purpose of black and white contrast. I think the point I made, though, is that having met people out on the playa who aren't "one or the other" - mostly in terms of thin, attractive women who don't wield their appearance as a club, I'm developing more confidence that it doesn't have to be that way.
I'm not a young struggling career entrant either. I've been working in a male-dominated field for 20 years. While I admit my interpretations may be lacking, my observations are based on real-life experiences. I also work in a field that tends to be a bit "incestuous" also. Reputations are important and can precede and always will follow you. Mistakes are costly, so it pays to be conservative. I do believe I'm excessively so (despite the blue hair!), but I've experienced the cost of even a small slip.
You identify a few issues with my thinking that might use improvement. Great! Any suggestions on improving, other than "don't think that!"? I have to say, I don't find that particular type of criticism useful, in that just about everything I'm putting down is based on my own interpretation of real experience. I can't resist that that with admonitions that I shouldn't believe it.
In regards to my view on "feminism". Back when I was in school, I would listen to my colleagues talk about feminism. Listening to these men talk, I would see how the perspective of putting the gender first would undermine the sense of personhood equality that we were striving to achieve. If I could say I was anything, I'd say I was a "personist" because that's the part of me that I like people to consider first. While I really love being feminine and am happy to put forth many, many reasons I'm glad I'm not a man, I don't consider that the most important aspect of me... yet I feel that unless I suppress it, I'll always be a "woman engineer" (or whatever) like it makes me distinct from the other "people". -
-
Re: A different kind of freedom.
Wed, September 19, 2007 - 12:44 PM"You identify a few issues with my thinking that might use improvement. Great! Any suggestions on improving, other than "don't think that!"?"
I can't tell who you are responding to there due to threading, but in my longer post I gave several suggestions, some quite specific. I also ended saying "There are ways to get more comfortable with yourself if you wish to discuss that". I went through a similar struggle when I was a young adult and found that it's an internal journey, starting with taking ownership instead of being a victim. If that's an aspect you feel would be worthwhile I can give advice based on what I found helpful, but I'd need some time to compose it since it's not a simple do-one-thing-and-it-solved issue.
"yet I feel that unless I suppress it, I'll always be a "woman engineer" "
IMO the need to suppress one's gender shows a rather narrow definition of what that gender means, of that gender identity. Yes, there are times when it is appropriate to be more private with one's sexuality, just as there are times when it is appropriate to not shout obscenities, or go barefoot. Not all aspects of our personality or behavior are suited for every situation. Dialing them up or down them doesn't mean denying your identity, it simply means recognizing basic social customs.
Also, as I said there are many different movements of feminism and a person may not agree with some. However I don't believe that being comfortable with the word feminism (as opposed to shunning it or putting a negative connotation to it) means a person has run around screaming "I am woman, hear me roar" or preface every accomplishment with "woman _______". In fact, part of feminism is not being defined by your gender. I know several men who are feminists, for example.
"Is that to self-serving or trivial for this crowd? "
That's a rather snarky remark. You might have a more productive discussion here if you avoid judging those who are engaging in the thread. -
-
Re: A different kind of freedom.
Wed, September 19, 2007 - 1:05 PM[how weird an entire reply posted, then disappeared.]
[edit] then when I reposted it showed up again. huh.
-
Re: A different kind of freedom.
Wed, September 19, 2007 - 1:52 PMHrm. In this regard, I'm not sure I agree with your all you've put out there.
First, I don't self-identify as a "woman technologist" or "woman engineer" - that's a label that has been applied. Frankly, I would like to consider myself just an engineer or technologist. Mostly it's men who are excited and surprised to see women in the role I'm in. Sometimes it's men who think that I somehow am part of some sort of a quota system. Even sometimes I get the label applied by other women in the industry who are concerned about my behavior. Since we are so few in number, I represent more than myself, I'm setting the standard for women into the field. Frankly, I find the term distasteful, so I do what I can to get away from it.
I think I've addressed the feminism elsewhere.
I apologize for the bit of snarkiness at an earlier post. One of the things I positively loathe is people who come across as self-important or pejorative. If even a hint of "listen to my instruction for I have superior experience" comes across I tend to get argumentative, although I recognize I can be that way a bit myself. I can't imagine anyone who's fully satisfied with who they are as a person and doesn't have room to grow, regardless of their age. I tend to think of those people as a little brain dead. -
-
Re: A different kind of freedom.
Wed, September 19, 2007 - 2:44 PMsorry, I was going by your post earlier that said "yet I feel that unless I suppress it, I'll always be a "woman engineer" ". I was simply pointing out that feminism does not mean labeling yourself as "woman anything". It is often the opposite, trying to gain respect for yourself regardless of your gender. Ditching the term feminism all together, my general point here has been that one doesn't have to completely diminish all aspects of of womanhood and become masculine or genderless in order to be respected. As I said earlier IMO the need to suppress one's gender shows a rather narrow definition of what that gender means, of that gender identity. We don't need to show every aspect of ourselves, in their entirety, in every situation or to every person. However, we should allow ourselves the freedom to be a whole person, which means in part broadening our definition of what woman means, and means in part not letting other people's limited definition restrict us.
"I can't imagine anyone who's fully satisfied with who they are as a person and doesn't have room to grow, regardless of their age."
This entire subject is a journey, not a static destination. Some people are just at different stations. :)
-
-
-
Okay, I've been having trouble wading through all this dense prose
Wed, September 19, 2007 - 5:12 PMbut this paragraph stood out:
<s that to self-serving or trivial for this crowd? >
Why even bother asking questions of people you consider trivial? Or have all the intellectual heavyweights in this crowd, given up on this topic?
-
-
-
Re: A different kind of freedom.
Wed, September 19, 2007 - 11:58 AMQuite possibly the most offensive sexual attitude I've had from men (and being a strong-type woman, I get this a lot) is one of "come over here girl and do me!" *shudder*<<
What kind of guys are you hanging out with?!
I hang with some quite "unabashedly interested in hot chicks" males and they know better than to say that to any woman. Especially when she is a strong type woman, as that is the very type of woman that will most likely go right over and whack them upside the head.
>>>>>>My experience has been that people can sense a lack of confidence and comfort with yourself. And those who like to prey upon that will be quick to seize the opportunity. As you gain and exude confidence you minimize their ability to see you as someone who can be manipulated, dominated, intimidated, or dismissed.<<<<<
THIS. This is one of the most truthiest things I have read on this tribe.
-
-
Re: A different kind of freedom.
Wed, September 19, 2007 - 12:35 PMI hang out with technogeeks mostly. I also came from the midwest where they're slower to catch on, and not every idea makes it all the way out there. Of course they don't often say in so many words that's what they want...
-
-
-
-
Re: A different kind of freedom.
Wed, September 19, 2007 - 7:33 AMwow... i'm kind of a lurker on this tribe and i don't say much but this really grabbed me.
and what i want to react to is your notion about fat women and sexiness.... i'm "fat" - and i'm only recently learning that fat and sexy/beautiful are not mutually exclusive. and my playa experience has been a big part of that. i usually wear whatever i want, and can feel sexy in it, but i live in a small, tight-knit community somewhat outside of mainstream culture. at burning man, i wore whatever i wanted, and STILL felt sexy and appreciated.
you say you don't want to lose weight because you don't want to be seen as "that kind of woman." what does that mean?? all thin women are sluts blindly driven by the patriarchy and neediness? and that no bigger women can possibly be engaged with their sexuality? that's what i hear you saying.
the ultimate sexiness is confidence - and with confidence comes respect as well. -
-
Re: A different kind of freedom.
Wed, September 19, 2007 - 11:54 AM"the ultimate sexiness is confidence - and with confidence comes respect as well."
exactly. well said. :)
My experience has been that people can sense a lack of confidence and comfort with yourself. And those who like to prey upon that will be quick to seize the opportunity. As you gain and exude confidence you minimize their ability to see you as someone who can be manipulated, dominated, intimidated, or dismissed. -
-
Re: A different kind of freedom.
Wed, September 19, 2007 - 12:31 PM"My experience has been that people can sense a lack of confidence and comfort with yourself. And those who like to prey upon that will be quick to seize the opportunity. As you gain and exude confidence you minimize their ability to see you as someone who can be manipulated, dominated, intimidated, or dismissed."
This is a REALLY interesting assessment. It explains a lot of what I was seeing and experiencing this year. It was my first burn, and camping alone I didn't have much advice or guidance from experienced burners. I had a lot of confidence what I was doing was right, but a few slightly bad circumstances right at the beginning were enough to undermine my comfort level with those around me. Only after I was able to stop caring did things really get fun. I wish someone would have told me to just let it go.
It kind of reminds me of a discussion I had with a guy I was dating when I was invited for Easter Dinner with his wealthy grandparents at their country club. I tend to use utensils in... interesting ways, and was asking him if I should eat like other people. He said it really didn't matter how I used the utensils so long as I used them well.
Thanks for the great advice!
-
Re: A different kind of freedom.
Wed, September 19, 2007 - 12:41 PMthese last posts are very well said!
and valkyrie, i think maybe the place for you to look for your confusion is in your statement that you don't consider yourself a feminist, yet you have issues with people filtering who you are, or are expected to be, through your gender.
i totally get that you are in a male-dominated field, made up in great part of men who aren't always the most socially sophisticated (at least in my experience with a big geek-heavy social world, and my experience doing technical recruiting).
but i you think that you are filtered differently because you are a woman and that is not fair, then you are a feminist. if you believe that you should be evaluated on what you do, not your gender, then you are a feminist. why do you resist that? though i do feel that the word has been a bit tainted with a sense of anger and man-hating, neither of which describes me, so like you, i prefer a different word. i like to call myself a humanist.
and i entirely agree that confidence is the key here -- being hesitant about who you are, wondering what people think of you, imagining that they discount you because of your hair or body or gender, and sidestepping or minimizing your power will indeed create a different result than just stepping up and being powerful about yourself.
and as far as people perceiving you on the playa... apologies if i'm paraphrasing wrong but... as an example, that might look like saying "hey, i'm an EE and a frickin' genius at wiring neon and creating lighting systems (or whatever you love to do), and i'd like to volunteer for your art project... who do i talk to?" is a more powerful place to come from than bemoaning not having people understand what you really have to offer, and then feeling put off that they're surprised when you mention it later. it's always better to learn to toot your own horn when you want people to know what you can do, i think.
holding back keeps everyone from experiencing the real you, doesn't it? -
-
Feminism and categories
Wed, September 19, 2007 - 1:22 PMIf a person believes that race doesn't matter, do you call them a racist? How is it that feminist has come to mean that being female doesn't matter? The perspective I have is that the "genderist" label should be applied to thoughts and actions that are discriminatory, and what is equitable should be label-free, since it's the logical default behavior...
The socially inept men that I talk to about it seem to feel that feminists are emphasizing their femininity and if they'd just stop talking about it then the obstacles they face would melt before the pillars of pure logic. Of course, we all know this isn't exactly the way the world works, but there is a certain amount of negative backlash that comes when an issue is pushed too hard. I can't tell you the number of people who genuinely believed that women were hired to fill some sort of unidentified quota or other nebulous balance requirement. I felt a lot of the womens studies folks were pushing a lot in the wrong direction, not doing much good, but the backlash was having a significant impact. -
-
Re: Feminism and categories
Wed, September 19, 2007 - 1:36 PM"If a person believes that race doesn't matter, do you call them a racist? How is it that feminist has come to mean that being female doesn't matter?"
no one here has said that that I can see. I'm really confused where you're getting that coming from.
"but there is a certain amount of negative backlash that comes when an issue is pushed too hard. "
who is pushing too hard? where are they doing it and when? And what issue, exactly? the issue of respect and equal opportunity, or something else? often it's the approach and not the issue that is causing backlash. For example, PETA members showing films at public events of that are nothing but animals being brutally murdered and screaming just results in people tuning out because the approach is more like taking a bat to someone's head than having a conversation. That doesn't mean that the issue of humane treatment of animals shouldn't be discussed at all. In NYC there are a few groups of black men that stand on the corner shouting about how all white men are the devil and should be killed. That approach does nothing to help foster racial equality, but that doesn't mean that the issue of racism is invalid and should be ignored.
I kinda feel like this is veering off the original question, but maybe not. -
-
Re: Feminism and categories
Wed, September 19, 2007 - 1:47 PMfawk. too, not to. I'm guaranteed to have at least 1 bad typo in every post. :) my fingers are clumsy.
-
-
-
Re: A different kind of freedom.
Wed, September 19, 2007 - 1:33 PMOh, the bemoaning was something that came at the end of the event, when there was no work left to be done. What surprised me was that I got an assumption rather than a question. I started late in offering to help (on different projects than the person I was talking with worked on), so probably the real source of the complaint I had to start with probably had more to do with disorganized projects than anything. It just kind of put me off that he seemed to assume it was lack of useful skills. It wasn't a big issue, just something that stuck with me.
-
-
-